Facebook Spreads More Misinformation

As a LightWorker with independent views on what in the world is going on, I figure I'm not doing my job if my words and deeds go unopposed by the Establishment. So it was no big surprise to run afoul of the new Facebook "fact-checkers" and have several reposts about COVID-19 condemned as "False Information."

As a reporter for several online alternative publications, I've been covering the Wuhan novel coronavirus since mid-January 2020 when the western world first got wind of it. When I write for my international readership, I check my facts and cite my sources.

On Facebook, I play around. It's for fun, right? I go there to hang out with my cyberpals and exchange views freely. I don't always vet interesting-looking information that crosses my Newsfeed. As a die-hard skeptic, I figure my friends can do that if they wish.

 

Well, now, Facebook's "independent fact-checkers" have flagged a very intriguing article, How To “Legally Decline” A Vaccine, which they reproduced word-for-word to debunk it.

This meme - which I did not vet before sharing it with my social media friends (not the general public) - claimed that a U.S. citizen can "legally decline" a government-ordered vaccine by asking if it contains MRC-5 (aborted fetal tissue) or a possibility of an iatrogenic reaction (adverse side effect).

Here is the original suppressed post:

STEP 1. Do not 'refuse' a vaccine otherwise you'll be considered belligerent. Instead, you can politely decline their services by doing the following.

STEP 2. Ask the doctor if the vaccine has MRC-5 in it (they all do, these are aborted fetal cells and other DNA). If it does, you have the right to decline.

STEP 3. Also, ask if there is a possibility of an "iatrogenic reaction" (an adverse reaction caused by multiple compounds or drugs interacting with each other) from the vaccine (they all do). When the doctor says, "Yes it does", that's your "Get Out of Vaccine Jail Free Card". Thank the doctor for their offer and walk away.

Remember, doctors have sworn the Hippocratic Oath (which is to do no harm) and they MUST honor it. This is how we can legally (and respectfully) decline their offered mandated services and there is absolutely NOTHING they can do about it! Now you know!

The Facebook "fact-checkers" counter-claimed that "the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the government can force vaccinations, and a citizen can only avoid it if they can prove that they are not 'a fit' for the vaccine and that it would 'seriously impair their health' or 'probably cause his death.'"

Now we all know how to dodge a dodgy vaccine.

The Supreme Court decision dates back to 1905 when the world knew oh-so-much about vaccines, compared to today. No, wait, it's the other way around. Let me get my facts straight.

In 1905, the highest court of the land allowed that a local, state, or the federal government can make vaccinations mandatory. In that case, "the plaintiff Jacobson was ordered to pay a $5 fine for refusing a smallpox vaccination."

The Facebook "fact-checkers" also shared that "not all vaccines are connected to MRC-5, which are cells derived from a fetus aborted in 1966."

Good to know. Those earnest Facebook censors even quoted the Vatican:

"The Vatican concluded that while alternatives to vaccines connected to MRC-5 should be sought and the use 'must be eliminated as soon as possible,' the health of children and the 'population as a whole' must be considered. In other words, it is approved for Catholics to use."

Perhaps most interesting of all, though, was the fact that an article posted on Harvard Health Blog in 2015, The Myth of the Hippocratic Oath, cited a 1989 survey that found "barely half of U.S. medical schools used any form of the Hippocratic Oath and only 2% used the original."

So, doctors who have not sworn to "do no harm" propose to inject us all with a COVID-19 whenever it becomes available - typical development time for a vaccine is measured in years, not months - should we still be alive and living in abject poverty by then.

Thanks, New World Order, for setting the facts straight!

There are so many stories from people who have accused vaccines of ruining their lives. Thanks to the ramped-up vaccine schedule imposed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Detection (CDC), infant autism has been linked to the numerous viral injections required.

 It is well-known that vaccines contain harmful components, including small amounts of antifreeze and certain toxic heavy metals. Yet, parents are being denied the right to refuse vaccinations.

Now, adults stand to be denied of that right, too.

It's time to let your elected representatives know how you feel about herd or community immunity versus forced quarantine and prolonged misery, followed by forced vaccinations and mandatory travel ID cards - or microchips. All of this is being planned right now by power-mad state governors and WHO globalists.

This is not fake news. These are facts. Go check it out.

And, for pete’s sake, don’t believe everything you read on social media. Get a grip, people.

by LightWorker111


Share this post


Leave a comment

2 comments

  • I quit having my children vaccinated about 35 years ago because it was starting to be questioned if vaccines were causing more problems than they prevented I try my hardest to persuade my grand children not to have my great grandchildren vaccinated most do not vaccinate

    • Janet Youren
  • “infant autism has been linked to the numerous viral injections required.” This is not a fact. In fact it has been thoroughly scientifically disproven. But the nut cases in LA that choose to avoid the Measles vaccine and then had their kids come down with Measles took much greater risk of serious harm. Not just for them but anyone who had a serious reason to avoid a vaccine. (i.e not pig headedness.) It’s fake news.

    • Rick Barrett